Overview

The objective of this workshop is to develop and incorporate safety requirements into trials planning, as part of the activity to realise evidence for the safety case.  In addition, to consider the safety of the trials themselves and the role of safety in trials development

Task

Developing the ITEAP

Update the table below for each SRD requirement selected, using the dropdown box, to identify:

  • How the requirement will be verified (design, test, calculation, inspection, etc).
  • Detail how the verification will be undertaken (e.g. a test plan).
  • Define the acceptance (pass/fail) criteria.
  • State when in the CADMID cycle the verification will be undertaken (this could happen at several stages, depending on the test).
  • Identify if a SCR is required to support the verification assessment.
wdt_ID SRD Requirement Verification Strategy Verification Details (Specific details of the test, etc) Acceptance Criteria Stage of CADMID SCR needed to conduct verification
335 The flame tower requires a monitoring system when burning gas Factory acceptance testing Test against system requirements measure of performance e.g. sampling frequency Pass Manufacture Yes
342 The system requires an isolation period of no longer than 10s at the wellhead and tanker Factory Acceptance test Test time to for valves to close to confirm it's less than 10s, does it match the data sheet Pass Manufacture, Demonstration Yes
344 The system shall be safe to operate at all expected pressures (8bar) Factory Acceptance Test Test system across all working pressures when a part of whole system as well as on individual data sheets Pass Assessment, Concept, Manufacture, In-Service, Disposal, Demonstration Yes
345 The system requires a Knock out drum that separates liquids from gases before they reach the flare stack. Factory Acceptance Test and Sea Acceptance Trial Test in factory for compliance and at sea to test for parts per million Pass Assessment, Concept, Manufacture, In-Service, Disposal, Demonstration Yes
346 The system requires Noise levels emitted to comply with the Control of Noise at Work Regulations Sea Acceptance Trial and Simulation computer based modelling for components, sea trial for whole system Pass/Fail Assessment, Concept, Manufacture, In-Service, Disposal, Demonstration Yes
347 The system requires the super structure to be coated in corrosive restant paint Factory Acceptance Test/ Through life monitoring Meets corrosive certification requirement XXX Pass/Fail Manufacture, In-Service No

Trials – Hazard Identification

Before trails are undertaken, it may be necessary to undertake hazard identification and assessment to ensure the trials can be conducted safely. Consider your SRD requirements above and those associated with the pressure requirements of the OIL SSTS, or an element of. Develop your Test Plan in the table above to with sufficient detail to allow the team to undertake a hazard assessment of the proposed test, using the ASEMS hazard checklist guidewords and the table below to capture your output.

wdt_ID Hazard ID Hazard Title / Description Causes Control / Safeguards Accident Description Recommendations / Actions
51 1 Working at height installing/teardown test gear in hard to reach places Training and PPE, Access i.e. scaffold, RAMS, Weather Monitoring Slips, trips, Falls Damage to equiptment RA before working at height, minimise working at height were possible and insert controlled access for height and limit number of people.
55 2 Onboarding Personal wet/unfamiliar conditions, non routine platform access with none standard access system life jackets 1m from quayside, PPE e.g. suitable footwear, Handrails slips, trips and falls life jackets 1m from quayside, PPE e.g. suitable footwear, Handrails
56 3 Noise SSTP testing Hearing protection Hearing Loss Hearing protection